Nera Capital!!
What is happening with Nera Capital loans?. All contracts tell only interest payments till expiration. But today NC started principal repayment of all loans running for 3 months or less and also some 17% interest loans still running for 8 months. Are there no secured agreements between Mintos and Credittors? Seems like it and an ongoing issue creating most of the loan problems?
-
Finalmente notizie.
Grazie Marek
0 -
@Marek. Sofar we have never been informed about the content of restructuring agreements of any note in longtime overdue in the past, so I hope the comprehensive update concentrates mostly on a time path of when we can see our money back that has been dead for 6 months now. Even including some possible deviations.
0 -
Ugo,
Più di sei mesi bloccato il denaro.
0 -
The latest update offers nothing new. The agreements are ready, but what’s next? Taxes are now in play, so we need a clear deadline for tax submissions. Mintos must enforce investor protection more aggressively. Who will trust the platform when so many companies break the rules? Nera isn’t the only one with payment issues, and the 60-day buyback guarantee feels like a joke :). Updates should include realistic timelines, not just 3 months of "results coming soon." How can money be distributed without recovery guarantees? Did Nera do this on purpose—stopping interest payments while they continued to collect money on loans?
0 -
Sadalne,
Agreed, with you. We don’t want to be taken for fools by anyone. We’re tired.0 -
Dear Mintos,
I feel seriously misled by Mintos over its promotion of Nera Capital Notes. In October 2024, Mintos actively promoted these Notes, offering an interest rate of 14% together with a 5% cashback incentive.
This raises a fundamental question: was Mintos already aware of the financial difficulties affecting the law firms financed by Nera Capital when it was encouraging investors to put their money into these Notes?
Publicly available information appears to show that two of Nera Capital's major borrowers were already facing significant financial difficulties. One had failed to file its 2023 accounts within the statutory deadline, while the other had initially filed accounts that were subsequently restated, revealing a substantial debt burden. Furthermore, by that time, one of these firms had already accumulated considerable debt at an exceptionally high interest rate from Claim Finance, the company operating under the Nera Capital brand.
Given these circumstances, I find it difficult to understand how Mintos could promote these investments so aggressively without adequately assessing and disclosing the underlying risks.
I cannot help wondering whether this campaign was intended to attract substantial amounts of fresh capital from investors who were unaware of the potential risks, potentially leaving them holding the bag when the underlying financial problems eventually came to light.
I believe Mintos owes its investors a clear and evidence-based explanation of what it knew, when it knew it, and why it considered these Notes suitable for such aggressive promotion.
0 -
They won't provide one. I asked multiple times, on the last one I got an answer from layers with a speagetti-like answering pointing to points that where they refused to answer. In essence, they replied to exactly 0 of my questions.
Short answer is yes. Somewhere along the way, they realised they messed up, and found ways to cover themselves.
Starting with the obvious, that they anounced that Nera never defaulted anything. They "forgot" to mention that the company in question had been created one month before and didn't had any activity. Because Nera (main company) already had a record of defaulted debt, which they didn't mention...
0
Vous devez vous connecter pour laisser un commentaire.
Commentaires
187 commentaires