Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

Nera Capital!!

Kommentare

23 Kommentare

  • Sheila Segni Bertocchi

    Piuttosto sono preoccupata perché Nera Capital sta andando in default!!!

    0
  • Ugo

    Potresti fornire prove o indizi a sostegno di questa affermazione?

    0
  • Ugo
    If you ask AI if there are financial problems this is what you get:
    Based on available information regarding Nera Capital, a litigation funding specialist operating across the UK, Europe, and the US, recent reports highlight both rapid growth and specific operational challenges related to their financial operations and loan portfolios.
    Key Challenges and Potential Refinancing Issues (As of Late 2025):
    • Extended Transfer Delays: Reports indicate that Nera Capital has been utilizing "pending days" to the extreme, resulting in approximately one-month delays for fund transfers.
    • Repayment and Recovery Pressures: While Nera Capital has hit significant milestones (e.g., $100m+ in investor returns and $1bn in Expected Realisation Value), there are indications that achieving 100% recovery on some portfolios is considered unlikely by observers, suggesting potential impairment in underlying assets.
    • Operational Execution Issues: Concerns have been raised regarding operational execution, which may impact revenue generation and create bottlenecks in the timely repayment of investor capital.
    • Refinancing and Portfolio Extension: To manage these issues, it has been noted that Mintos (a platform hosting Nera Capital) might need to sign new agreements to refinance or extend Nera Capital’s portfolios.
    • Jurisdictional Hurdles: Nera has identified challenges in adapting funding structures to comply with specific, varied requirements, including disclosure obligations and court oversight across different jurisdictions.
    Contextual Factors:
    • Growth Focus: Despite these issues, Nera Capital is actively expanding, having recently launched a $50M litigation fund to expand into the secondary market and secured additional funding lines to scale operations.
    • High-Risk Asset Focus: The firm specializes in complex litigation and consumer redress (e.g., medical device claims), which inherently involves long timelines and unpredictability in cash flows.
    In summary, the primary "problems" revolve around managing extended timelines on high-value litigation cases and operational bottlenecks, necessitating potential extensions or refinancing of loan portfolios to maintain liquidity and investor returns.
    0
  • Sheila Segni Bertocchi

    Nei miei conti sono già nella sezione IN RITARDO nella sezione IN RITARDO da oltre 2/3 settimane

    0
  • Ugo

    "We are in contact with Nera Capital to clarify the situation regarding the temporary overdue funds. We will provide an update as soon as more information is available".

    I guess this is just a phone call and inform your clients. The ponderous and convoluted style of writing doesn’t bode well. Buckle up!

    0
  • Cyril F

    Marek (Mintos) Lucja (Mintos)

    Please again can you tell us more ? Is it concerning or just a simple administrative formality ?

     

    Is nera likely to bankrupt and will transform on a yearss procedure, or it will go back to normal in month.

    Why we still have only some frustrating news. And again no plan?

     

    Please elaborate 

    Thanks

    0
  • Ugo

    It took Mintos long time to come up with a reaction from Nera Capital why they did not pay interest over € 61 million since 25th of March:

     Nera has provided the following message to investors: Law firm payments are delayed due to ongoing investigations of borrowers/law firms by the SRA. This is a market-wide position for more than 80 volume litigation law firms in the UK due to the collapse of some law firms and the SRA being under pressure to properly regulate the sector. They must be shown to protect consumers and their claims against duration and other risks. 

    Due to this, the law firms are not going to make interest payments until the investigation is concluded and their solvency is satisfied to protect their position. The payments will be made as soon as the investigations are complete. Additionally, pending payment interest will be calculated on the delayed payments.

    It is important to note this has nothing to do with processing, compliance, governance, or other regulatory issues. It is down to solvency and making sure contingent law firms throughout the UK are properly capitalized to maintain their operational expenses until settlements start to flow. This is an important factor for all stakeholders, and while currently frustrating, it will ultimately work out well long term.

    This is not a very satisfying answer. First of all there is no direct, formal relationship between Nera Capital and the SRA (Solicitors Regulation Authority). Nera is Irish and SRA exclusive British. They operate in different, albeit connected, spheres of the UK legal landscape. Nera works for a big part in the UK but also has a strong rapidly extending business outside the UK. So what about the interest payments over loans that are placed worldwide outside the UK. In other words  Mintos go back to contact them and do your homework in the interest of your clients. 

    0
  • Ugo

    Reading the following article and combine this with the lack of payments from Nera and you might conclude they are in trouble.

    https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/sra-warning-notice-high-volume-claim-firms  

    As usual Mintos presents trouble with sunny side up, but longtime investors know that mintos can make you soaking wet and losing lots of money.

    0
  • Ugo

    Trying to find more in connection between NERA C and the SRA research AI brought the following:

    •    The SRA has identified structural compliance issues with both AML controls and high-volume claims;
    •    firms must improve their documentation, conduct more rigorous reviews, and provide clients with more transparent information;
    •    for parties involved in litigation funding, this means greater scrutiny, more due diligence, and a higher likelihood that law firms will adopt a more conservative approach to their partnerships;
    •    in the absence of specific public findings regarding Nera Capital itself, it can be said that such parties operate in a sector that is now subject to heightened regulatory oversight.

    The SRA has visited 25 law firms in the autumn of last year and has decided to dive deeper into 9 firms.

    https://publications.sra.org.uk/high-volume-consumer-claims-thematic-review/introduction 

    Although they don't mention any lawfirm in particular it does make sense to expect that Nera Capital is one of them and as a consequence have been forced to put all money streams on hold. SRA does not mention any tiome line to finish the investigation

    0
  • Cyril F

    THank yo Ugo for your help of clarification, but I don't really trust IA in particular of news information finding. By definition IA are not trained and not well suited for latest news.
    I think your answer is base on hold information (+1year).

    It would be nice to have more information coming from MintosInvester Lucja (Mintos) Marek (Mintos)

    1
  • Ugo

    @Cyril I had more comment but they keep them in pending approval. mintos quicly get in damage control and refuge messages. A reason why I am going to stop with mintos. I had hoped to limit my cashdrag here because of Nera loans full repayments starting soon. so this is a reral set back for me. When (I guess Mintos self) Nera Capital is offered on the 2e market with 15% loss then we are probably in the same situation as Planet 42 where that happened too.

    0
  • Ugo

    @Cyril I asked AI about the connection between SRA and Nera as a start,  but later found most info directly and up to date on the SRA website. don't expect anything from Lucja or Marek. They are not aloud to say anything. Cetainly not when it comes to Mintos weakest spot: no control over creditters at all.

    0
  • Cyril F

    Ugo And so what do you find ? I don't take that time ?
    DO you have any info ? or guesses about a timeframe ?


    In my opinion I don't think nera has funding problem, it has always paid on time since I started to invest with them.
    I have seens many more company in a less good shape

    0
  • Pietro Giuseppe Vitetta

    Salve amici, entro io, ho iniziato con Mintos a ottobre 2024 acquistando per  il 95% de mio investimento, prestiti Nera capital ad alti tassi e bonus allettanti. Sempre ricevuto il denaro tranne quest'ultima settimana che mi sta' facendo preoccupare. Ho in ballo tutte le scadenze a circa 4 mesi per € 75.000 circa oltre agli interessi.

    Già sono bloccato con obbligazioni EDS in default Mintos per circa € 18.000, non mi pare sono messo bene?!

    Che devo fare? Ho il denaro su 6 - 7 piattaforme regolamentate estere, mi riprendo i soldi e li reinvesto in Italia in conti deposito al 3% lordo con vincolo a 5 anni? Che dite amici?

    0
  • Sheila Segni Bertocchi

    In effetti anche io ho già easy debt obbligazioni in ritardo ed ora anche Nera Capital...sono molto preoccupata

    0
  • Ugo

    I think many people hold a significant proportion of Nera notes because, according to Mintos, it is a very reliable lender and it is true: they have always paid on time, although there has been an increase in delays in recent months. I have written to Nera myself and also to the SRA to gain a better understanding of the problems with high volume claims, but I doubt they will reply. It is difficult to identify who is in trouble because these law firms are not named. Moreover, Nera is a capital provider and does not itself disclose which law firms it supports and which are in trouble. It remains a strange story as to why Nera’s payments are being suspended on grounds of solvency. They operate with a capital of 800 million dollars. The outstanding Mintos loans amount to just 61 million. It is difficult to say whether this argument is truly valid. It strikes me that this refusal to pay coincides with a large tranche of Notes redemptions due to take place shortly, combined with the fact that they have not yet issued any new loans on Mintos to finance these redemptions.

    0
  • Pietro Giuseppe Vitetta

    Due investimenti grossi su piattaforma Mintos, tutti e due, uno in default e l'altro poco ci manca. Che bell'affare! E poi dicono che la colpa è di chi investe! Deve accollarsi il rischio. Ma io penso che Mintos debba anche potenziare le procedure di controllo due diligenze sia all'ingresso dei nuovi richiedenti prestiti, sia durante la fase intermedia ed intervenire subito in caso di irregolarità o movimenti sospetti. l'ha fatto con Auga che poi ha rimborsato tutto pure in anticipo. È nell'interesse di entrambi, investitori e Mintos. Se io perdo denaro in piattaforma, non consigliero' all'amico o al parente di entrare a registrarsi!

    0
  • Ugo

    @pietro  Mintos ha registrato nuovamente una perdita di 2 milioni nell'ultimo trimestre. Ha investito 3,8 milioni nello sviluppo IT, creando una divisione di portafoglio inutile che alla maggior parte degli investitori non piace. La loro capacità di collaborazione con i creditori fa schifo, se si guarda al punteggio di rischio di Mintos. Non hanno accordi di garanzia, la ricerca è limitata a causa della mancanza di personale, immagino, e andare a recuperare i soldi è costoso, quindi la colpa ricade sull'investitore. Le penali per i pagamenti in sospeso e scaduti sono molto deboli e spesso non vengono applicate. Ho un portafoglio con un cashdrag del 5% ogni mese, che mi ha fruttato 24 € di penali in 3 anni. Una barzelletta. 

     

    0
  • Pietro Giuseppe Vitetta

    Sono rabbrividito e molto deluso. Pensavo fosse una delle migliori e più sicure piattaforme, invece, mi stai raccontando un'altra verità. Sono bell'e fritto. Posso considerarmi un'investitore anche io in Default, con prossime gravissime perdite!! EDS- + Nera oltre € 100.000 investiti

    0
  • Marek (Mintos)

    Dear investors,

    This is the information that we have recently shared regarding Nera Capital:

    Investing in Nera Capital Notes on the Secondary Market currently carries increased risk.

    Payments from underlying law firms are delayed due to an ongoing investigation by the UK Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which is affecting a significant number of litigation law firms across the UK market.

    Nera Capital operates in litigation financing, where repayments depend on the progress and outcomes of legal cases managed by law firms.

    These firms generate the cash flow used to make payments on the Notes. While the investigation is ongoing, interest payments are paused until the financial position of the law firms involved becomes clearer. This is a broader issue hitting the UK litigation financing sector, where regulatory scrutiny is changing how law firms handle payments and capital, and it is not limited to Nera Capital.

    Based on information provided by the company, payments are expected to resume once the investigation is concluded and the relevant conditions are met.

    We will update this notice as further information becomes available.

     

    0
  • Pietro Giuseppe Vitetta

    Allora era meglio lasciare i soldi n banca al 3% lordo in conti deposito vincolati a 5 anni. Che fregatura!

    0
  • Cyril F

    Hello Marek (Mintos),
    Thank you for this update but nothing really new. I hope payment will resume but

    Do you have any estimation on when payments will resume ? a month ? a year ? more ?
    Do you have any estimation on potential loss ? 

    It would be really helpful as always to have more timeframe

    0
  • Kaspars

    Marek (Mintos) you mentioned "interest payments are paused". According to this statement, we can expect the principal to be paid in time when the loans mature, of which the first ones will do in few weeks and it affects only interest?

    0

Bitte melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen.